Re:US Senators ask Apple to pull DUI checkpoint apps
by thecoffman on Wednesday March 23, 2011 @10:34AM
(#2359523)
Avoiding checkpoints if you're sober and don't want the inconvenience of waiting in line at a checkpoint for one. Also see the explanations of other people in this thread describing how announcing the locations of the checkpoints ahead of time can be more effective.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:US Senators ask Apple to pull DUI checkpoint apps
by JoeAltmaier on Wednesday March 23, 2011 @11:26AM
(#2359780)
Really? All these sales are to upstanding citizens wanting to save a traffic stop?
Then why isn't the app called "traffic stop"? Its called "Tipsy" or something like that. It covers only DUI traffic stops. Who is this marketing to? Who is buying it? We all know the answer.
Yes, its good to protect freedom of speech. Its also good to make the streets safer. And DUI is a real problem, not a strawman.
Re:US Senators ask Apple to pull DUI checkpoint apps
by LordBodak on Wednesday March 23, 2011 @12:20PM
(#2360022)
The average speed trap doesn't affect traffic (unless you happen to be the person pulled over). DUI checkpoints often have miles of stopped cars waiting to go through.
Re:US Senators ask Apple to pull DUI checkpoint apps
by checker on Wednesday March 23, 2011 @01:22PM
(#2360320)
I see what you're saying, but speed traps definitely cause significant bottlenecks in the DC area, probably because of rubbernecking and braking (or the fact that everyone is speeding).
Re:US Senators ask Apple to pull DUI checkpoint apps
by JoeAltmaier on Wednesday March 23, 2011 @03:21PM
(#2360911)
So you plan to buy 'Tipsy'? Just wondering how much of this is a strawman