News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Executive order expected to suspend H-1B, other visas unt... by P_I_Staker on Saturday June 20, 2020 @03:58PM (#23586725)
Something isn't adding up here, even in areas with high COL people are clamoring for jobs like that. I'm not saying it never happens, something just doesn't sound right.

Also, the vast majority of people on H1-Bs that I've worked with are quite... average. It's nothing against them, but I doubt they were blowing people away in the interview. Many of them do have better attitudes, though.

That's not to say that there aren't exceptional examples, or a given candidate was bad, but we absolutely could of hired some kid from university, or a mid-senior level from a US company. They just tend to have more demands.

It's not exactly a secret the main reason for the program, is to lower wages here. ie. keep the wages of nationals in check. Of course, you also get access to a better deal on labor, and people that want the job very badly.

I could be off base, but many of the people I've worked with on H1-Bs simply cause less political problems. It's not necessarily a cultural thing, as I'm including many different countries. They have the threat of deportation hanging over their head.

Re:Executive order expected to suspend H-1B, other visas unt... by triceratops on Saturday June 20, 2020 @04:03PM (#23586774)
Off-topic, but just a tip. "could of" is never correct (nor is "would of" or "should of").
Re:Executive order expected to suspend H-1B, other visas unt... by zo1 on Saturday June 20, 2020 @04:15PM (#23586876)
Or could-have, which I think is more applicable in the sentence you're correcting. Or am I missing some obscure grammar rule?
Re:Executive order expected to suspend H-1B, other visas unt... by triceratops on Saturday June 20, 2020 @04:21PM (#23586939)
No you aren't missing anything. "could of" (and its cousins "would of" and "should of") are common mistakes made (interestingly) almost exclusively by English-as-first-language speakers (my observation, so don't ask for citations I don't have any), since they sound similar to "could have", "would have" and "should have" particularly in "native" English accents (I'm thinking North American and UK especially).

I've never seen "could-have" (hyphenated) though. I don't think that's right either.

Re:Executive order expected to suspend H-1B, other visas unt... by silasrude on Saturday June 20, 2020 @10:48PM (#23589342)
It's the contraction of could have. "I could've been a contender Charlie!"
Re:Executive order expected to suspend H-1B, other visas unt... by hooloovoo_zoo on Saturday June 20, 2020 @05:30PM (#23587480)
It's just misspelled. 'Could've' is a standard contraction.
Re:Executive order expected to suspend H-1B, other visas unt... by zo1 on Sunday June 21, 2020 @05:04AM (#23590831)
I did misspell it in my comment. It definitely should have (should've? :) ) been written as "could have".
Re:Executive order expected to suspend H-1B, other visas unt... by triceratops on Saturday June 20, 2020 @07:23PM (#23588306)
"Could-have" is misspelled? Or "could of"?
Re:Executive order expected to suspend H-1B, other visas unt... by jpmoral on Sunday June 21, 2020 @12:31AM (#23589771)
It's "could have" or "could've".
Re:Executive order expected to suspend H-1B, other visas unt... by triceratops on Sunday June 21, 2020 @01:45AM (#23590138)
Right