Re:Unsubscribe: The $0-budget movie that ‘topped the US box ...
by austhrow743 on Saturday June 20, 2020 @12:53AM
(#23581774)
Equating a desire for sex with women with misogyny is in itself discriminatory. I'm not sure if its discriminatory against women or against men, maybe just both, but its certainly one of them.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Unsubscribe: The $0-budget movie that ‘topped the US box ...
by vmception on Saturday June 20, 2020 @02:03AM
(#23582087)
> Equating a desire for sex with women with misogyny is in itself discriminatory.
It fits the definition for misandry. Ironically. Equating courtship advantage things men do with contempt is inherently misandrist (or we're at an impasse). I hope people are able to reconcile their corrosive relationships and prior life experiences to be more collaborative.
Re:Unsubscribe: The $0-budget movie that ‘topped the US box ...
by Kaze404 on Saturday June 20, 2020 @01:01AM
(#23581820)
That's not the mysoginistic part.
Re:Unsubscribe: The $0-budget movie that ‘topped the US box ...
by csunbird on Saturday June 20, 2020 @06:56AM
(#23583199)
Please do not confuse misogyny with facts. If he said "I would to that and that would have worked because women are like this" that would be misogyny. But stating something he tried and did succeed is a fact.