News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Fukushima made me pro nukes by wiredfool on Tuesday March 22, 2011 @10:30PM (#2357657)
It's a 40 year old plant with a 50 year old design that was done before Plate Tectonics and subduction zones were accepted theories. (ca late 60's for those theories)

And, despite fudged safety records, losing all cooling power, and having a 9.0 quake and a 12 m tsunami hit it, it still hasn't killed anyone. That's pretty good. It's bad that it's going to cost billions of dollars to secure, but in the scope of the overall disaster, it's a small percentage.

In 20 years, there's a good chance that people will be saying "I can't believe that they kept building gas and coal plants, look at what it's done to the environment."

Re:Why Fukushima made me pro nukes by orblivion on Wednesday March 23, 2011 @12:37AM (#2358024)
I hate to be pedantic, didn't it at least kill a couple workers?
Re:Why Fukushima made me pro nukes by wiredfool on Wednesday March 23, 2011 @12:59AM (#2358097)
A crane fell. Not radiation. (unless there's been a recent change)