Re:Apple’s App Store fees are ‘highway robbery’ – House anti...
by sjwright on Friday June 19, 2020 @04:28AM
(#23572343)
That's fine, but how are you going to construct legislation that specifically targets Apple's walled garden without breaching the Fourteenth Amendment?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Apple’s App Store fees are ‘highway robbery’ – House anti...
by koheripbal on Friday June 19, 2020 @08:36AM
(#23573844)
No new legislation needed. Existing anti-trust laws can be used to force them to de-couple the apps from the devices.
In the same way the government forced Microsoft to de-couple Internet Explorer from Windows.
Re:Apple’s App Store fees are ‘highway robbery’ – House anti...
by mirchibajji on Friday June 19, 2020 @06:09AM
(#23572929)
Genuinely curious. I was under the impression that Constitution applies to people, and the govt. I'd appreciate if you point to any references for Constitution being applied to corporations.
Re:Apple’s App Store fees are ‘highway robbery’ – House anti...
by tomatotomato37 on Friday June 19, 2020 @10:10AM
(#23574684)
Corporations have had personhood for a while, it's why they also have free speech protection and stuff. 14th amendment protection specifically was decided in 1886 (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Clara_County_v._Southe...)
Re:Apple’s App Store fees are ‘highway robbery’ – House anti...
by sjwright on Friday June 19, 2020 @11:33PM
(#23581377)
Correct.