News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:CUDA on Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 by bransonf on Thursday June 18, 2020 @07:27PM (#23569296)
I'm exactly the audience Microsoft is winning over. For the last 3-5 years, I've been an avid Mac user. The primary reason has always been the familiarity of the terminal.

Now, Apple is making a lot of hardware decisions that I don't like. Having used WSL daily for several months now, it's the game changer.

My next laptop will probably be a PC, and I can only say this because of WSL.

Re:CUDA on Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 by hvis on Thursday June 18, 2020 @07:47PM (#23569439)
Your next laptop will be a personal computer?
Re:CUDA on Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 by _cairn on Thursday June 18, 2020 @08:05PM (#23569561)
I believe they meant PC as in PC (Windows) vs Mac. I've encountered a lot of people who use PC <-> Windows Machine interchangeably.
Re:CUDA on Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 by txcwpalpha on Thursday June 18, 2020 @08:38PM (#23569772)
"Personal Computer" has long been specifically associated with Windows machines and specifically excludes Mac and Linux. It started with the "IBM Personal Computer" and its branding caused non-IBM machines (eg Macintosh) to use other branding ("a mac"). When IBM partnered with Microsoft to make home computers, this branding really solidified that "PC = Windows".

And then of course, there was the very successful advertising campaign from Apple where they specifically distinguish Macs from PCs: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Get_a_Mac

Essentially, Macs are "personal computers" but they aren't "Personal Computers", if you know what I mean.

Re:CUDA on Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 by hvis on Thursday June 18, 2020 @09:34PM (#23570136)
I have been rather miffed that the lack of corporate branding/identity for Linux at the time when Macintosh decided to "distinguish" itself now means that GNU/Linux machines are apparently not "personal computers" anymore.

But if PC = IBM PC, and those basically always came with Microsoft software, I guess history supports that interpretation.

Re:CUDA on Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 by RaptorJ on Thursday June 18, 2020 @08:37PM (#23569767)
PC as in IBM PC compatible
Re:CUDA on Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 by hvis on Thursday June 18, 2020 @09:27PM (#23570097)
Does that imply Windows?
Re:CUDA on Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 by ivalm on Thursday June 18, 2020 @11:02PM (#23570543)
From a historical branding perspective —- yes!
Re:CUDA on Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 by jussij on Friday June 19, 2020 @03:21AM (#23571941)
Apple spent a lot of money selling the idea the Mac was totally different to the PC:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0eEG5LVXdKo