News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The first woman PhD in computer science was a nun (2013) by fanf2 on Tuesday June 16, 2020 @11:42AM (#23540484)
Steve Shirley https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Shirley was able to found a computing consultancy business in the 1960s staffed entirely by women that had been fired when they got married, as was the usual practise at the time.
Re:The first woman PhD in computer science was a nun (2013) by eropple on Tuesday June 16, 2020 @11:59AM (#23540699)
This is an amazing story I've never run across. Thank you for pointing it out. I think you got trolled, but I'm glad I got to learn about this as a result.
Re:The first woman PhD in computer science was a nun (2013) by rodgerd on Tuesday June 16, 2020 @05:39PM (#23544556)
It was the norm for banks in New Zealand, through to the sixties and early seventies, to require women to have a letter of permission from their father or husband in order to get a job.

Source: have seen the ads specifying such.

Re:The first woman PhD in computer science was a nun (2013) by befeltingu on Tuesday June 16, 2020 @12:07PM (#23540792)
Ok, fair enough I never knew this was a common practice. I was thinking more about today when I made my comment
Re:The first woman PhD in computer science was a nun (2013) by erichocean on Tuesday June 16, 2020 @12:43PM (#23541195)
> Ok, fair enough I never knew this was a common practice.

What makes you think it was common practice? Exceptions are a thing…

Re:The first woman PhD in computer science was a nun (2013) by fanf2 on Tuesday June 16, 2020 @03:12PM (#23542901)
For an example of it being not just common but in some cases required to dismiss women when they married, see "The Marriage Bar" at https://civilservant.org.uk/women-history.html
Re:The first woman PhD in computer science was a nun (2013) by erichocean on Tuesday June 16, 2020 @03:47PM (#23543262)
I'm talking about forming all-married women businesses. I'd be shocked if that was common, but if you have data showing otherwise, I'm happy to be corrected...