News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Adobe to remove Flash Player from web site after December... by hutzlibu on Tuesday June 16, 2020 @05:47AM (#23537354)
"The vast majority of Flash content that people actually want to use is either standalone movies or static websites"

How about flash games? I bet much more time was (and is) spend on flash games, than movies or static websites alone.

But games are performance critical.

Re:Adobe to remove Flash Player from web site after December... by a1369209993 on Tuesday June 16, 2020 @08:13AM (#23538180)
Exactly. The vast, vast, majority of Flash content that people actually want to use is not standalone movies or static websites, but flash games.
Re:Adobe to remove Flash Player from web site after December... by afiori on Tuesday June 16, 2020 @08:52AM (#23538520)
In flash lingo aren't games just interactive movies? I remember being quite confused when I discovered I could play pirated flash games on my video player software.
Re:Adobe to remove Flash Player from web site after December... by Wowfunhappy on Tuesday June 16, 2020 @09:32AM (#23538929)
I mean, to the extent that Tetris, Pacman, or Super Mario is an interactive movie, sure? I guess technically they're a series of animations which change (very quickly) when you press a button. But most people would call those games.
Re:Adobe to remove Flash Player from web site after December... by afiori on Tuesday June 16, 2020 @10:09AM (#23539306)
I mean that they are movies in terms of what Flash call movies. Flash covers a huge number of features (networking, interactivity, animation, etc.) I believe that Flash games are implemented with the functionalities intended for interactive movies.
Re:Adobe to remove Flash Player from web site after December... by kmeisthax on Tuesday June 16, 2020 @09:15PM (#23546546)
That's included in the phrase "standalone movies". I'm so used to working with SWFs that I call all of them "movies" even if they're entirely a single frame with everything handled in ActionScript.