Re:Adobe to remove Flash Player from web site after December...
by Someone on Monday June 15, 2020 @07:56PM
(#23534452)
Some x86s further JIT compile x86 instructions to micro-operations.
(That isn’t normally called JITting, but I think one can view it as such, especially when the CPU caches the translation, as in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NetBurst_(microarchitecture)#E... or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CPU_cache#UOP-CACHE)
Re:Adobe to remove Flash Player from web site after December...
by lixtra on Tuesday June 16, 2020 @01:45AM
(#23536264)
> actually three levels of JIT compilation.
And that’s totally fine to support legacy code.
After all, it continues to put some tiny pixels on a screen, emit some light and gets interpreted by some huge neural networks that took decades to train and finally releases a small shot of endorphins.
Why not just start with the endorphins?
Re:Adobe to remove Flash Player from web site after December...
by indigo945 on Tuesday June 16, 2020 @04:44AM
(#23537093)
To be clear, I think this is an amazing project and I very much appreciate this effort to preserve legacy software. When I say it is a wonder that this runs with acceptable performance, that's also to be taken as a compliment to the developers. :)
I'm looking forward to seeing this as a dependency of any future Electron app too; Moore's law must be brought to use.