Re:U.S. Supreme Court endorses gay, transgender worker prote...
by sfkdjf9j3j on Monday June 15, 2020 @01:20PM
(#23530030)
That's the inverse, not the converse, and if we're talking about propositional logic it is not implied by the original statement.
The "not a protected class" counterargument is self-defeating because it suggests that discrimination was A-OK before that protected class was created by law. If illegality does not imply immorality, as is often said on HN, then conversely legality does not imply morality.