Re:U.S. Supreme Court endorses gay, transgender worker prote...
by OldHand2018 on Monday June 15, 2020 @12:31PM
(#23529225)
I specified that it ceases to be as private as it once was, not that it was no longer private.
If opening a store to the public made it not private property, then well meaning rules like “no shirt, no shoes, no service” would have to be handled by local ordinance, which would be overly cumbersome.