Re:GitHub to replace “master” with alternative term to avoid...
by musingsole on Monday June 15, 2020 @09:58AM
(#23527353)
"root" might be more appropriate than either "main" or "master".
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:GitHub to replace “master” with alternative term to avoid...
by mmm_grayons on Monday June 15, 2020 @10:14AM
(#23527530)
I suppose that makes more sense than main, but it still begs the question: given that there is no actual slave reference to remove, and discounting the questionable necessity of removing such a reference were one to exist, what's the problem here?
Re:GitHub to replace “master” with alternative term to avoid...
by musingsole on Monday June 15, 2020 @10:46AM
(#23527859)
Do you work with people who are experts in things you are not? When one of them raises a concern from the field they're an expert in, you generally must take it as a given that the issue is real and must be addressed, as the expert raised it and wouldn't have otherwise. Your role might be to point out how the presented fixes to the issue might/will cause issues in your field of expertise, but it'd be pretty unprofessional to question the validity of the other expert's designated problem.
Re:GitHub to replace “master” with alternative term to avoid...
by mmm_grayons on Monday June 15, 2020 @06:59PM
(#23534061)
Sorry, who exactly is the expert here that shouldn't be questioned? While I generally respect experts' opinions, I also find it reasonable to question them when they don't pass the smell test.
Re:GitHub to replace “master” with alternative term to avoid...
by musingsole on Tuesday June 16, 2020 @01:41AM
(#23536248)
I can respect your smell test if you can respect that it's highly susceptible to Dunning-Kruger and the various mishaps of not knowing what you don't know.
Re:GitHub to replace “master” with alternative term to avoid...
by _vbdg on Tuesday June 16, 2020 @09:02AM
(#23538638)
You still didn't tell me who these "experts" are, though it seemed you were referencing several in a prior comment, so I'm unsure how to address that point. I'd of course respect the opinion of an expert, and I'd recognize that I have a very good chance of being wrong, but that makes it even more important to question things. If I'm right, we come to a better conclusion; if I'm wrong, I learn something.
Re:GitHub to replace “master” with alternative term to avoid...
by musingsole on Tuesday June 16, 2020 @10:25AM
(#23539471)
I didn't answer your question because it's rather obvious. Thanks for the downvote though!
Re:GitHub to replace “master” with alternative term to avoid...
by _vbdg on Tuesday June 16, 2020 @11:24AM
(#23540226)
HN doesn't permit users to downvote replies to their comments, so you can be sure that wasn't me. Maybe it's obvious to you, but I'm not sure how one qualifies as an expert in the necessity (or not) of removing the word "master" from github branches. Would you please elaborate?