Re:GitHub to Remove 'Master' Terminology
by multiplegeorges on Monday June 15, 2020 @09:00AM
(#23526821)
I keep seeing this stated as fact without any citation whatsoever.
Here's an argument with citations that the term "master" in the git context does indeed come from the master/slave terminology:
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2019-May/...
That's where I assumed "master" came from. But it still doesn't fit, because a master copy is normally static. The master branch in Git is anything but static.
Re:GitHub to Remove 'Master' Terminology
by loco5niner on Monday June 15, 2020 @11:34AM
(#23528452)
> because a master copy is normally static
That depends on the time scale you are considering.
Re:GitHub to Remove 'Master' Terminology
by ohlookabird on Monday June 15, 2020 @11:55AM
(#23528771)
Why not use "primary" then? In database terminology primary and replica are quite common for instance.
1. https://www.instructables.com/id/Two-Part-Silicone-Casting/ 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mastering_(audio)