Re:Google adds experimental setting to hide full URLs in Chr...
by marksomnian on Sunday June 14, 2020 @09:43AM
(#23517583)
The extension ID is literally hard coded in the code of the scheme hiding code. https://source.chromium.org/chromium/chromium/src/+/master:c...
Re:Google adds experimental setting to hide full URLs in Chr...
by andrewprock on Sunday June 14, 2020 @10:31AM
(#23517880)
How a proprietary extension can get preferential features illustrates that chromium is open source in name only.
Re:Google adds experimental setting to hide full URLs in Chr...
by shadowgovt on Sunday June 14, 2020 @11:38AM
(#23518464)
Hardly. If you look at firefox's source, you will find several extensions that are hard-coded for special handling. This is not new.
Re:Google adds experimental setting to hide full URLs in Chr...
by andrewprock on Monday June 15, 2020 @11:49AM
(#23528687)
True, but the distance between Firefox source and Firefox is config+compile.
You cannot compile Chrome. I've heard that Chromium can be compiled and run, but I've never actually seen it, or hear of anyone using that professionally.
Re:Google adds experimental setting to hide full URLs in Chr...
by shadowgovt on Monday June 15, 2020 @12:03PM
(#23528858)
I'm not sure what your point is... You thought it was weird that an extension would get preferential treatment, and I pointed out that this is true for Firefox also.
Re:Google adds experimental setting to hide full URLs in Chr...
by andrewprock on Monday June 15, 2020 @12:10PM
(#23528949)
My point is that you are correct.
There are other factors at play which mitigate the preferential treatment, but it's definitely there in Firefox as well.
Can anyone reproduce this?