At the very least, he's at the same level as Tojo Hideki, whose invasion of Burma was the other cause of the famine.
We don't wipe out images of people no matter how evil they were.
How about you make the argument yourself, in your own words, if you think it's so convincing? Good luck convincing any rational adults that Churchill is on the same level as Hitler. Notwithstanding Churchill's flaws and racism, that's plainly ludicrous.
This is far more horrifying to me than the fact that Churchill held beliefs largely in line with his generation and upbringing.
I believe when we teach about Columbus, we should also teach about his introduction of the encomienda system of slavery.
I believe that when we teach the US Civil War, we include the founding documents of the Confederate states which declare in no uncertain terms that the states left the Union in order to preserve slavery, rather than letting the lies of the Lost Cause rewritten history persist. And we include how much the North benefitted from slave labor too.
I believe that when we talk about the history of unionization and suffrage movement we include talking about their racism.
I believe that when we learn about The Six Grandfathers (better known to you as Mt. Rushmore) we also learn that the land was stolen from the Lakota Sioux, and how Borglum was a knight of the Ku Klux Klan. And when we teach about the California Gold Rush era we also teach about the horror of the California Genocide.
Not talking about those aspects of our history is itself a rewrite.
But the idea that Google is deliberately blocking Churchill's image because of some sort of corporate desire to hide history to appease SJWs like me - what?! That makes no sense.
Image search still works fine if you need a photo of him.