Re:SQLite as an Application File Format (2014)
by HelloNurse on Saturday June 13, 2020 @04:52PM
(#23512616)
On the one hand, browsers dislike access to files (regardless of format) for security reasons.
On the other hand, browsers use SQLite a lot. For example Firefox uses SQLite at least for IndexedDB (various files) and for history and bookmarks (places.sqlite): https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Firefox_Ope...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:SQLite as an Application File Format (2014)
by mbreese on Saturday June 13, 2020 @06:18PM
(#23513293)
Wasn't there an effort a few years back to try to create a W3C standard for accessing data that stalled because all of the browsers used SQLite and no one wanted to create a different implementation? IIRC, the standard required two different implementations and SQLite was used by everyone?
Re:SQLite as an Application File Format (2014)
by EvanAnderson on Saturday June 13, 2020 @07:54PM
(#23513898)
You're think of WebSQL. My take on it dying was a combination of "key-value stores can replace relational semantics and key-value stores are cool", "only oldsters use SQL", and "wheel-reinventing is fun". The whole "we need multiple independent implementations" was a convenient excuse to kill it in my view.
Re:SQLite as an Application File Format (2014)
by alexhutcheson on Saturday June 13, 2020 @07:58PM
(#23513924)