Re:Young U.S. men having a lot less sex in the 21st century,...
by eloisius on Friday June 12, 2020 @04:42PM
(#23503695)
Your premise omits the possibility that there is correlation among the diverse orderings that women apply to men. Or even barring that, that they don't converge to an aggregate ordering which is what GP is explaining that men experience.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Young U.S. men having a lot less sex in the 21st century,...
by cortesoft on Friday June 12, 2020 @07:25PM
(#23504951)
Some traits will be clearly desirable, but so many aren't. Introvert/extrovert, opinions on how to raise kids, family goals, what sort of place you like to live (rural/urban), political views, conversation style, etc. Those are going to vary greatly amongst people.
Re:Young U.S. men having a lot less sex in the 21st century,...
by eloisius on Friday June 12, 2020 @09:27PM
(#23505825)
Yes, some preferences vary widely, while others are more narrow, such as height, income, seniority/authority, and facial structure. In aggregate there is a clear spectrum from desirable to less desirable along those dimensions. It's definitely true that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, or attraction more generally, but it's hard to believe that being 1.60 m tall won't make you (in general) less attractive as a man.