Re:A tech stack should be a well-balanced portfolio
by gridlockd on Friday June 12, 2020 @04:16PM
(#23503397)
If I didn't care what you wrote, I would not have replied to explain why your concern doesn't matter.
I did not repeat the argument. Let me explain it differently:
Let's say that on average N% of people give a project a star because they're active users and (100-N)% give a star for any other reason. There is no reason to assume that N will be significantly different for similar projects. I don't know N, but it doesn't matter how big N is, more stars still imply more active users.
Is there going to be variance here? Of course, but it's unlikely to distort the metric to the point where it becomes invalid, unless you have very samples (stars).
Indeed, if there's one project with 10 stars and another with 5 stars, the chances are high that it's just noise. You cannot get a good estimate of which project has more active users in that case. However, you can tell that neither are popular and both are risky dependencies.
I did not repeat the argument. Let me explain it differently:
Let's say that on average N% of people give a project a star because they're active users and (100-N)% give a star for any other reason. There is no reason to assume that N will be significantly different for similar projects. I don't know N, but it doesn't matter how big N is, more stars still imply more active users.
Is there going to be variance here? Of course, but it's unlikely to distort the metric to the point where it becomes invalid, unless you have very samples (stars).
Indeed, if there's one project with 10 stars and another with 5 stars, the chances are high that it's just noise. You cannot get a good estimate of which project has more active users in that case. However, you can tell that neither are popular and both are risky dependencies.