News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Biohacking Lite by karpathy on Friday June 12, 2020 @03:33PM (#23502803)
Yes natural sugar is just barely better than added sugar (due to the fiber it's typically mixed in with). The apples we eat today are candy bars, they just happen to grow on trees. Trees shaped extensively via artificial selection for thousands of years to pack in more glucose, trees that are nowhere near to what our ancestors have encountered for millions of years.
Re:Biohacking Lite by labelbias on Friday June 12, 2020 @05:51PM (#23504289)
Fortunately, apples are not candy bar. The metabolic effects of eating 1kg of apples is completely different from eating glucose and fructose extracted from those 1kg of apples.

Natural sugar is magnitudes times better than processed/added sugar.

Fructose consumed through fruits has never had a similar metabolic effect as high-fructose corn syrup.

Re:Biohacking Lite by blacksmith_tb on Friday June 12, 2020 @04:38PM (#23503668)
A Snickers bar has 27g of sugar in it[1], almost 3 times the 10g in the 'average apple' (without the fiber or water to slow down metabolizing it). I haven't encountered anyone claiming that obesity and diabetes are rampant in the US due to over-consumption of fruit (though fruit juice is not doing us any favors).

1: https://www.myfooddiary.com/foods/22930/snickers-regular-siz...