News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The social obligation to be bad at things by imtringued on Friday June 12, 2020 @04:49AM (#23497324)
Art is just human expression or communication. A lot of the "lazy" art is seeing with how much you can get away and how little meat there is to the word "art".

For centuries artists have tried their best to create the most beautiful artworks possible. This lead to an association of beauty with art. Art must be beautiful. You challenge this idea by making something that is not beautiful but people will still consider as art.

Re:The social obligation to be bad at things by the_af on Friday June 12, 2020 @10:28AM (#23499557)
I realize this is spread across multiple comments of mine now, but I specifically said I acknowledge art and beauty are not required to go hand in hand. I acknowledge some pieces of art challenge established boundaries, and some are grotesque or purposefully repulsive. I just dislike Fountain and similar "found objects" and consider them artless.

Otherwise, if everything is art as long as someone tells me it must be so, the concept of "art" becomes meaningless to me.