Re:The antitrust case against Google
by pb7 on Friday June 12, 2020 @12:57AM
(#23496177)
This doesn’t really make any sense. If there were overwhelming riches to be had in the Android market, companies would allocate greater resources to making Android apps good. But there aren’t — at least not compared to iOS — so the resource allocation is commensurate. Companies want money first and foremost; they don’t care which platform allows for a prettier UI if it gets in the way of $$$.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The antitrust case against Google
by sudosysgen on Friday June 12, 2020 @01:25AM
(#23496312)
I don't think that is true. Even when app development is a very small share of total cost, and certainly insignificant compared to benefits especially re: other makets, such as Snapchat, the Android app might be horribly lacking.
There aren't overwhelming riches to be had on either platform (unless you're Apple or Google of course).
The point I'm trying to make here is that people will use that figure (often without much thought) to justify giving Android users a sub-par experience - which only serves to reinforce it. I've worked for several companies that have given parity to iOS and Android, and one that did not. For the former we did not observe a disparity that large. YMMV by region and industry of course.