News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Breonna Taylor case: Louisville police nearly blank incident report. Parent comment

Re:Breonna Taylor case: Louisville police nearly blank incid... by gpm on Thursday June 11, 2020 @06:48AM (#23487394)
Being trained to break the law does not (legally) justify breaking the law.

I'm not sure if shooting someone in "self defense" who is legally shooting at you is illegal under US law, it's an interesting thought though.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Breonna Taylor case: Louisville police nearly blank incid... by jacobush on Thursday June 11, 2020 @08:46AM (#23488204)
There's precedent to say its legal to return fire.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Breonna Taylor case: Louisville police nearly blank incid... by OGWhales on Thursday June 11, 2020 @09:48AM (#23488817)
As an intruder?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Breonna Taylor case: Louisville police nearly blank incid... by jacobush on Thursday June 11, 2020 @10:23AM (#23489195)
I can't really remember the case, but there was a standoff where a (white) person returned fire against law enforcement after they shot his dog. In the end I think one law enforcement officer was killed on one side, and that guys wife, child and dog was on the other side.

There was no punishment for the killing of the LEO.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Breonna Taylor case: Louisville police nearly blank incid... by xyzzyz on Thursday June 11, 2020 @12:56PM (#23490816)
The incident you’re referring to is Ruby Ridge. There has been much more disconduct by the feds than just shooting guy’s dog, and his acquittal did not hinge on the fact that they shot his dog first.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Breonna Taylor case: Louisville police nearly blank incid... by jacobush on Thursday June 11, 2020 @01:16PM (#23491020)
No, I didn't mean to imply it.
[ Parent | on HN ]