Re:A one-year moratorium on police use of Rekognition
by couchand on Wednesday June 10, 2020 @08:45PM
(#23483975)
Doing the same thing but faster and cheaper doesn't necessarily mean it's better. If there's a high cost to a procedure, then the user would need to show the value of checking a candidate in some other way for it to be worth the effort. Making it easier and faster means you're more likely to check against random innocent individuals.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A one-year moratorium on police use of Rekognition
by randomdude402 on Wednesday June 10, 2020 @10:54PM
(#23484787)
Fast, cheap, good. You can only ever choose two.
Re:A one-year moratorium on police use of Rekognition
by TheCoelacanth on Thursday June 11, 2020 @03:12PM
(#23492335)
Often, you are lucky to get one.