Re:Working Group Last Call: QUIC protocol drafts
by JoshTriplett on Wednesday June 10, 2020 @08:06PM
(#23483664)
I don't generally comment on my employer, and I especially don't post about their internal policies. But I think it's reasonable to post this much, insofar as it's also a question I'd also answer for anyone thinking of interviewing: no, there's no MITM proxy. (There is a proxy; it does not MITM.)
> And would you, or whoever is doing it, stop downvoting me?
1) You can't downvote people who reply to you. 2) Discussions about downvotes are off-topic. 3) Downvoting to express disagreement is explicitly allowed.
I see this isn't going anywhere - you didn't acknowledge that if you work at Intel, you 100% have a web proxy on your campus despite saying otherwise, and now you're comparing adblocking by a private user on their computer on their time, and someone accessing the internet from their company's network on their company's time when and uploading arbitrary data across the Internet.
Again, you make some good points interlaced with bad ones: Yes, limit desktop access to corporate servers. Have strong IAM and auditing. But you think there is some right to have all the privacy in the world on their machine on their time. I fundamentally disagree.
And would you, or whoever is doing it, stop downvoting me? Despite our disagreements, this has been a substantive argument.