Re:Stanford Class on Deep Multi-Task and Meta-Learning
by Eridrus on Wednesday June 10, 2020 @10:13AM
(#23477197)
Another paper on the related topic of metric learning arguing that metric learning hasn't actually made any progress and is piggybacking on progress elsewhere: https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.08505
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Stanford Class on Deep Multi-Task and Meta-Learning
by orange3xchicken on Wednesday June 10, 2020 @12:59PM
(#23479350)
This is a pretty good paper, & they bring up many reasonable points, but I think it's important to distinguish deep metric learning from more traditionally formal ml methods for metric learning - there is plenty of progress being made in the context of scalable & provable metric learning algorithms that are robust to noise/corruption & missing data.
Recommend work & talks by Anna Gilbert for anyone interested. Entertaining & good at distilling technical content. Here is her most recent one, but there are other good ones on youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sb1ZhtsZjyM