I work in machine learning research and keep up with all of the top papers. I have exited on an ml startup that I founded. Very few coming out of china are top papers. Anyone can publish to arxiv. Measuring whether a model is state of the art is incredibly complex, overfitting to specific datasets is rampant.
Its also ridiculous that I am being downvoted.
USA occasionally has a reputation for being insular, but I'm happy to see you bucking the trend and embracing institutes across the continent of America.
I suppose I'm reading too much into why "an American Institute" gets capitalised but "china" or "chinnese" does not?
> overfitting to specific datasets is rampant.
Are your conclusions the result of having overfit to the software/research in your field you've looked at?
I don't know either way, but forgive me if I sense a tiny bit of bias.
Your honesty is appreciated. Facts are welcome too.
> I think they mostly use our code.
What's "our code"? The strongly connected set of open source software that happens to be written in English?