Re:U.S. Army Vintage Racer Concept Suggests Hypersonic Entry...
by blackflame7000 on Tuesday June 09, 2020 @09:23PM
(#23472860)
No, because it can loiter in the air for up to 2 hours in the target area before destroying its target.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:U.S. Army Vintage Racer Concept Suggests Hypersonic Entry...
by bootlooped on Tuesday June 09, 2020 @09:26PM
(#23472881)
A Tomahawk cruise missile can also loiter over the target area.
Re:U.S. Army Vintage Racer Concept Suggests Hypersonic Entry...
by whycombagator on Tuesday June 09, 2020 @09:37PM
(#23472943)
Presumably you can abort mission with a drone and have it return home. Not sure you can do that with a cruise missile.
Re:U.S. Army Vintage Racer Concept Suggests Hypersonic Entry...
by serf on Tuesday June 09, 2020 @09:48PM
(#23473008)
the IAI Harop is a missile that can loiter, and if no target is found can Return to Base.[0]
Although, admittedly, the lines between 'drone' and 'missile' have begun to blur.
Re:U.S. Army Vintage Racer Concept Suggests Hypersonic Entry...
by bostonsre on Tuesday June 09, 2020 @10:02PM
(#23473113)
Having your missile return home seems suboptimal.
Re:U.S. Army Vintage Racer Concept Suggests Hypersonic Entry...
by sibartlett on Tuesday June 09, 2020 @10:06PM
(#23473138)
That Wikipedia article repeatedly referred to it as a stone.
Re:U.S. Army Vintage Racer Concept Suggests Hypersonic Entry...
by amiller2571 on Tuesday June 09, 2020 @09:31PM
(#23472908)
So the difference between a missile and a drone is that one can fly in circles a little long than the other?
Re:U.S. Army Vintage Racer Concept Suggests Hypersonic Entry...
by NovemberWhiskey on Tuesday June 09, 2020 @10:29PM
(#23473284)
British Aerospace delivered an anti-radiation / air-defense suppression missile called ALARM in 1990: it is capable of flying up to 40,000 feet, deploying a parachute and then waiting for the target radar to come online as it floats down.
At that time, it initiates a secondary boost motor and attacks.
We didn’t used to call this a suicide drone; we called it a loitering munition.
Re:U.S. Army Vintage Racer Concept Suggests Hypersonic Entry...
by nirav72 on Tuesday June 09, 2020 @09:33PM
(#23472919)
so it's a next gen Tacit Rainbow? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-136_Tacit_Rainbow
Re:U.S. Army Vintage Racer Concept Suggests Hypersonic Entry...
by dilyevsky on Tuesday June 09, 2020 @10:02PM
(#23473109)
Supposedly nuclear powered missiles (if they really exist) can cruise for days
Re:U.S. Army Vintage Racer Concept Suggests Hypersonic Entry...
by viraptor on Tuesday June 09, 2020 @10:09PM
(#23473153)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Pluto looks both like an amazing idea and something super over-engineered. It looks like it would be relatively easy to spot too... and possibly shot down?
Re:U.S. Army Vintage Racer Concept Suggests Hypersonic Entry...
by blackflame7000 on Wednesday June 10, 2020 @01:09PM
(#23479479)
It would be capable of ICBM speeds but maneuverable instead of traveling in a predictable arc
Re:U.S. Army Vintage Racer Concept Suggests Hypersonic Entry...
by BurningFrog on Tuesday June 09, 2020 @09:38PM
(#23472954)
So a drone delivered bomb?