Re:Unsupervised translation of programming languages
by qayxc on Tuesday June 09, 2020 @06:41PM
(#23471771)
> It beats existing commercial products that try to do the same, so to me it seems it has some value right now.
While I agree with your conclusion, a minor correction is in order here: it beats a (as in a single selected) commercial product and a single free OSS transpiler.
The improvement for the commercial product is 61% vs. 75% accuracy (i.e. 23% better) which - while impressive given the unsupervised learning aspect - isn't a game changer (yet!).
While I agree with your conclusion, a minor correction is in order here: it beats a (as in a single selected) commercial product and a single free OSS transpiler.
The improvement for the commercial product is 61% vs. 75% accuracy (i.e. 23% better) which - while impressive given the unsupervised learning aspect - isn't a game changer (yet!).