News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Container technologies at Coinbase: Why Kubernetes is not part of our stack. Parent comment

Re:Container technologies at Coinbase: Why Kubernetes is not... by patricjansson on Tuesday June 09, 2020 @04:33AM (#23464858)
"conversations have led us to the conclusion that our customers want continued support of Swarm without an implied end date."

https://www.mirantis.com/blog/mirantis-will-continue-to-supp...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Container technologies at Coinbase: Why Kubernetes is not... by tylermenezes on Tuesday June 09, 2020 @08:22AM (#23465975)
No matter what they claim, it's really not supported in the sense most commercial oss projects are. We finally switched off after a minor version introduced a segfault when adding nodes in certain conditions, and the issue was unfixed after 5 months.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Container technologies at Coinbase: Why Kubernetes is not... by jmb12686 on Tuesday June 09, 2020 @11:37PM (#23473644)
This. Docker Swarm, and by extension Docker EE / UCP, is barely in maintenance mode. Go compare the Moby and docker projects on GitHub vs kubernetes.

To be clear, I use Docker Swarm in my home cluster due to simplicity and ease of use. Unfortunately that pattern hasn't scaled to the Enterprise.

[ Parent | on HN ]