Re:Container technologies at Coinbase: Why Kubernetes is not...
by GOTERTHe on Tuesday June 09, 2020 @02:00AM
(#23464109)
Tried Dokku, but found CapRover [1] to be a much better / easier option
Re:Container technologies at Coinbase: Why Kubernetes is not...
by jamil7 on Tuesday June 09, 2020 @03:38AM
(#23464595)
Looks great! considering migrating from dokku. I also came across exoframe recently which looks lower level but works with your existing docker projects https://github.com/exoframejs/exoframe
Re:Container technologies at Coinbase: Why Kubernetes is not...
by Lukas_Skywalker on Tuesday June 09, 2020 @03:02AM
(#23464402)
Better for what reason?
It seems Dokku wins at "easier" since in many cases, you can just push the application code you used for development and the required stack is automatically detected. Adding a database is two commands. No need to know Dockerfiles.
Re:Container technologies at Coinbase: Why Kubernetes is not...
by kasra85 on Tuesday June 09, 2020 @08:22AM
(#23465970)
It's easier because for many cases you don't even need to search the document ro know what command to run to fire up a database. You just select it from a GUI list.
Re:Container technologies at Coinbase: Why Kubernetes is not...
by gnud on Tuesday June 09, 2020 @06:53AM
(#23465456)
Looks interesting - but the installation instructions put me off a bit. Open a port on your server, and don't change the default password `captain42` - then run a cli tool from your dev machine.
I'll look more into it, but it didn't really inspire confidence.
[1] http://dokku.viewdocs.io/dokku/