Re:Potential organized fraud in ACM/IEEE computer architectu...
by BurningFrog on Monday June 08, 2020 @11:45PM
(#23463455)
Well, science literate people working at the journal, I assume.
The point is that they did not have a conflict of interest.
In 2020 peer review, people are often asked to review the work of their rivals. So they're incentivized to (1) say that it's bad and demand many changes, and/or (2) steal their ideas.
The point is that they did not have a conflict of interest.
In 2020 peer review, people are often asked to review the work of their rivals. So they're incentivized to (1) say that it's bad and demand many changes, and/or (2) steal their ideas.