> Please don't comment on whether someone read an article. "Did you even read the article? It mentions that" can be shortened to "The article mentions that."
Yes, I looked the website, and I also have my own website that does the same thing in a very similar manner. My comment was entirely in response to the suggestion Mac speech recognition be used for this. It should not be used for this. Based on previous experiments I have personally performed, it would be even worse than the website's accuracy. I then pointed out what a good solution might look like (and neither my website nor the linked website do the good solution yet)
I’ve had some decent results with the following:
I have to research how to hand tag my own samples to see if that offers significant accuracy improvements (let’s say I want to accurately transcribe one voice consistently).
Google and Watson APIs are not too free, and I believe Watson has a audio length limit (possibly limited by free tier, or possibly limited in general for all tiers).
Cool to see some real world attempts using this stuff.
https://rogueamoeba.com/loopback/
Someone clever enough could create containers to run the software locally and have many loops running off many streams to many instances of the audio to text feature.