News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:YC competitor: how TechStars was born by rms on Sunday May 20, 2007 @06:08PM (#23455)
#1: Institutional investors in biotech require patents for funding. Period. Without a patent, there is no funding. If you don't have a patent, you're probably stepping on someone else's IP. Unlike software patents, life science patents are real and enforceable.

#2: There are regulatory issues for most biotech startups. This means you may need 3 years of cash to burn before you have a chance of seeing revenue.

#3: Startup costs are all around higher. Just about always, biotech startups need specialized high end lab equipment in very specific lab spaces. The only lab I've found that will take me is in San Jose and is $3,000 a month. The _only_ commercial lab space in Pittsburgh is with a state sponsored institutional investor and they only give space to portfolio companies.

A YC for biotech would need to be a true incubator with office/lab space. And you'd have to give each team $100,000. In biotech, $100,000 is equivalent to the "living expenses only" money that YC gives out.

It could very well work and I'd love to see it but someone would have to put up a very, very large amount of capital for something very risky by the standards of biotech investment.

Re:YC competitor: how TechStars was born by kmt on Sunday May 20, 2007 @08:10PM (#23485)
Very interesting. After all these difficulties, what attracted you to biotech so much? I'm really curious. Is it primarily an intellectual/scientific curiosity or a desire to help people or the business aspect of it or...?
Re:YC competitor: how TechStars was born by rms on Sunday May 20, 2007 @08:31PM (#23492)
I'm in biotech because I see a rare opportunity to bring a company to revenue on $10,000. All I have to worry about is being sued.

It also gives me a pathway to this: http://news.ycombinator.com/comments?id=13464