News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why don’t journalists link to primary sources? by jashkenas on Saturday March 19, 2011 @08:10AM (#2343393)
This is changing. Many journalists would love to share and link to their primary source documents, but don't have an easy-enough way to do it.

At DocumentCloud, we're trying to change that. Here is a list of newsrooms that use DocumentCloud to share their sources -- you'll notice most of the usual suspects in there:

http://www.documentcloud.org/public/#search/

Here's a good example of a major 5-part story that cites its sources heavily. Take a look at the source documents page, and try reading one of the articles, and clicking on the links:

http://www.lasvegassun.com/hospital-care/

Re:Why don’t journalists link to primary sources? by kleinmatic on Saturday March 19, 2011 @09:52AM (#2343569)
Jeremy's right -- publishing source documents is becoming a regular part of the process. DocumentCloud has accelerated that. At ProPublica we make a regular practice of it. Here's an index of documents we've published alongside stories:

http://www.propublica.org/documents

(Disclosure: I work at both ProPublica and DocumentCloud)

Re:Why don’t journalists link to primary sources? by elehack on Saturday March 19, 2011 @09:56AM (#2343582)
Is part of the problem that a lot of professional media is from a print-oriented perspective, so that in the journalistic/editing mindset and initial target medium hyperlinking isn't possible?
Re:Why don’t journalists link to primary sources? by kleinmatic on Saturday March 19, 2011 @11:17AM (#2343772)
Really, it's that publishing at the scale of a big paper requires separation of responsibilities. The workflow hasn't caught up to the new medium -- and neither has the publishing software. Newspapers are notoriously slow to adopt new tools. The New York Times was composed using linotype machines until 1978 -- about 20 years late -- and when I worked there in the late 1990s the pagination system (essentially, the CMS) was a green screen application running on a few rows of PDP-11s.
Re:Why don’t journalists link to primary sources? by schwanksta on Saturday March 19, 2011 @02:08PM (#2344264)
Kleinmatic is 90% correct -- reporters are used to banging out copy, passing it to an editor, re-writing it, passing it to a copyeditor, re-writing that, back through the ringer, and passed onto someone they've probably never met who fits it on a page. They've never had to really worry about the presentation on the paper besides the number of inches and maybe worrying about a sidebar or illustration to go with it.

So in that sense, asking them to link -- a presentation function! -- is very new in and of itself.

But also, a lot of the content management systems make linking prohibitive. The version our reporters and editors see makes you paste it into the story as a plain, unadorned URL, bumping against the words you want to link. But hope there's no comma after it -- it's comin' with it. And if you need to edit those words, you might screw the URL with it.

Re:Why don’t journalists link to primary sources? by robryan on Saturday March 19, 2011 @10:59AM (#2343734)
Footnotes? Academic papers have until recently been designed mostly with print in mind and had no problem directing people to primary sources.

I guess part of it is the print mindset of giving the impression to readers that the journalists at the paper generated all the content without any borrowing of materials.