A long time ago, a high school diploma was rigorous enough that people actually failed. A significant number of people did not earn one. Now, I don't even know of a friend of a friend who has failed to earn one, even if they just kept on retaking the courses at relatively easy schools until they passed.
It isn't clear to me what holding a high school diploma indicates about a person anymore simply because nearly everyone gets one.
What does holding a high school diploma prove?
The other model, human capital theory, says that a high school diploma proves that the student has acquired specific skills (algebra, European history, etc) and therefore built up human capital. Signaling theory says the specific skills are not the point.
If the tax is more expensive than on the job training, employees will get on the job training, possibly through an apprenticeship.
They could just set their employer talent management system to filter out applicants without those degrees.
What once required a high school diploma requires an undergraduate degree. What once required an undergraduate degree requires graduate school. Most of your time spend in school is learning skills that the labor market cares little for.
Not wholly convinced by his conclusion that entirely defunding education is the path forward, but it's a perspective I found very interesting!
Here's the interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1hZylJp-pHo&t=495s