Widely disseminated hydroxychlroquine study retracted by authors

Re:Widely disseminated hydroxychlroquine study retracted by ... by stcredzero on Thursday June 04, 2020 @04:21PM (#23421284)

There's even more going on here. Take a look at the studies and note 1) the timing and 2) the lack of zinc. We've already had statistically significant results, where zinc is a significant factor with HCQ. Also the timing doesn't make sense. Wait 4 days after they show up so the virus can replicate, then give them a viral replication inhibitor? Huh?

Check out Dr. Martensen's videos. He's called this stuff earlier than anyone I'm aware of:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IUD_wvkNhnk

Also, compare and contrast what the news media was saying at the time. Then, compare and contrast with this: (WHO report which also shows how safe HCQ is)

https://www.who.int/malaria/mpac/mpac-mar2017-erg-cardiotoxi...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Widely disseminated hydroxychlroquine study retracted by ... by ejstronge on Thursday June 04, 2020 @04:48PM (#23421572)

I’ve never seen a published report on zinc and chloroquine, and this combination seems to only appear in YouTube videos. Do you have any links to clinical studies?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Widely disseminated hydroxychlroquine study retracted by ... by stcredzero on Friday June 05, 2020 @01:46PM (#23431464)

There's a study referenced here. The p-value for Zinc vs. No Zinc is 0.003.

https://youtu.be/IH2UoBUcW2I?t=1289

The study title, and authors are here: https://youtu.be/IH2UoBUcW2I?t=1008

[ Parent | on HN ]