Re:Microsoft shuts down giant Rustock spamming network
by radicaldreamer on Friday March 18, 2011 @05:53PM
(#2342139)
The only reason most botnets consist of Windows computers is because Windows is ubiquitous, difficult for the average Windows user to secure, and full of security issues from add-ons and plugins.
Look for future malware to be spread using the biggest rarely updated smartphone platform (currently Android).
Re:Microsoft shuts down giant Rustock spamming network
by nitrogen on Friday March 18, 2011 @07:44PM
(#2342476)
Cell carriers really need to realize that they're effectively selling perpetually-connected pocket-sized computers, and that refusing updates because they're "not in the business plan" is going to cause them an inordinate amount of grief due to malware.
Re:Microsoft shuts down giant Rustock spamming network
by CamperBob on Friday March 18, 2011 @09:52PM
(#2342731)
The carriers are not the sort of businesses who are well-known for thinking ahead.
Re:Microsoft shuts down giant Rustock spamming network
by rbanffy on Saturday March 19, 2011 @12:14AM
(#2342950)
They still won't be able to bend reality to their convenience. When this can of worms is opened, it will be nasty.
The only thing that may come to their aid is that telcos have a power over the phones that connect to them no PC OS maker has. Well... Maybe Apple will get there...
And, BTW, once phone manufacturers realize they need to provide security updates for the life of the phones, they will trim their lineups down to very manageable levels.
Re:Microsoft shuts down giant Rustock spamming network
by rbanffy on Friday March 18, 2011 @05:56PM
(#2342157)
> The only reason most botnets consist of Windows computers is because Windows is ubiquitous, difficult for the average Windows user to secure, and full of security issues from add-ons and plugins.
So, the only reason are actually 3?
That said, most botnets consist of old unpatched Windows computers or spreads via third-party software (e.g. Flash/Acrobat Reader), and MS' market share means that it will be targeted even if it their security is no worse than their competitors'. Windows security still could be better, but I don't think blaming Microsoft is as justified as it was before e.g. XP SP2.