Re:Vote by Mail: Ballot Fraud Risk, State Laws and Trump's C...
by klyrs on Thursday June 04, 2020 @11:27AM
(#23417892)
Progressive Democrats and Never Trump Republicans need to vacate their respective parties. No idea how you and I could effect that change though -- awkward thing about "democracy", we only get the choices presented to us by those in power.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Vote by Mail: Ballot Fraud Risk, State Laws and Trump's C...
by rsynnott on Thursday June 04, 2020 @11:35AM
(#23418013)
The US electoral system (or at least the common one; one or two states have flirted with modernising it) makes more than two parties unviable. In general countries without proportional representation or similar are two party systems (or occasionally 2.5 party systems like the UK, for historical reasons), countries with PR are multiparty.
Re:Vote by Mail: Ballot Fraud Risk, State Laws and Trump's C...
by klyrs on Thursday June 04, 2020 @12:08PM
(#23418410)
Yeah that would be a great start. Sorry state of affairs in Canada and the US is that even when politicians run on a platform of election reform, they change their tune because the system worked for them. The excuse I hear most often is some form of the electorate being too stupid to navigate such a complicated system.
Re:Vote by Mail: Ballot Fraud Risk, State Laws and Trump's C...
by rsynnott on Thursday June 04, 2020 @02:22PM
(#23419964)
The _fairest_ PR systems actually are very complicated, which is why they're rarely used in practice. Systems like PR-STV, though, are both a lot fairer than first past the post, and relatively understandable (in countries that use them, most people understand the basic mechanics, and _everyone_ understands them well enough to use them correctly, even if the subtleties are lost on most people).