News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Researcher questions years of his own work with a reexami... by hliyan on Thursday June 04, 2020 @10:19AM (#23416831)
Thanks, this was what I was looking for. So I guess this pathway is not very predictable, hence the variations in subsequent measurements of the same subject.
Re:Researcher questions years of his own work with a reexami... by jrumbut on Thursday June 04, 2020 @12:56PM (#23418993)
Also consider aligning the images to process them all with a single model, the different sized/shaped heads in the world and correcting for their different angles and little bits of movement. That's not even considering differences between brains.

I am continually amazed at the level of automated preprocessing tools to deal with this alignment problem. You can play around with fMRI data using some popular packages without thinking too hard about it and produce visualizations almost as nice looking as the ones in the article.

Re:Researcher questions years of his own work with a reexami... by brainmapper on Thursday June 04, 2020 @02:57PM (#23420389)
The most sensitive fMRI methods don't do alignment at all, they do all data processing in the individual subject's brain space.
Re:Researcher questions years of his own work with a reexami... by brainmapper on Thursday June 04, 2020 @02:55PM (#23420368)
Much of the day-to-day variation concerns uncontrolled variability in blood pressure, arousal and attention. Those factors have enormous influence on the blood-oxygen-level-dependent signal.