Re:Anders Tegnell defends Sweden's virus approach
by mantas on Thursday June 04, 2020 @05:53AM
(#23414607)
Anecdata vs statistics? Some people did die. Some do know them. If no people you know died, does it makes it a media hoax?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Anders Tegnell defends Sweden's virus approach
by Semaphor on Thursday June 04, 2020 @12:32PM
(#23418715)
Yes, I used statistics. You said it’s likely. I gave numbers on how many people you’d need to know to, on average, know someone who died. Which, considering how high that number is, does not make it seem "likely"
Edit:
> does it makes it a media hoax
Honestly, you completely lost me there. Did you read some other comment and attributed it to me?
edit2: FWIW, I wear a mask when going to the store despite it being only required inside, one of maybe 5% of people who do that. And that’s in a city of 200k with 0 known active cases.
Re:Anders Tegnell defends Sweden's virus approach
by matz1 on Thursday June 04, 2020 @08:49AM
(#23415902)
Sure its sucks for some people who die or know people who died but for most other people they won't even notice.
Re:Anders Tegnell defends Sweden's virus approach
by mantas on Thursday June 04, 2020 @09:56AM
(#23416576)
What's what I said up the thread. It's a tragedy for people directly involved even though averaged-out it becomes a cold statistics.
Personally I'd rather not gamble wether I'd end up on tragedy or statistics side.