Here’s a thought experiment:

A black man and an Asian man rob a bank together. They are caught, charged, and found guilty of the same crime.

The black man is set free because his race is over-represented at the local jail, but the Asian man serves 8 years in prison.

Because nobody is saying someone is superior to another person here, the above example is not racist and totally fine, in your definition of racism. Even though it is obviously deeply unethical and unfair.

That thought experiment does not reflect any realities of the real world that we are discussing, so I don’t find it particularly interesting. The analogous situation would be if judges systematically sentence Black men to twice the jail time for that crime as Asian men, and someone proposed correcting that disparity by cutting the Black man’s sentence in half (so that it would match the Asian man’s sentence). I would support that.