News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Workman Keyboard Layout (2010) by archseer on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @11:29PM (#23412069)
I'm using a similar layout (Norman) that was derived from the Workman analysis. https://normanlayout.info/about.html

It was a bit easier to learn because most of the keys are on the same finger as on qwerty, but with the rows swapped. For me the biggest problem with using an alternate layout is that the hjkl vim movement keys are scattered.

Re:Workman Keyboard Layout (2010) by thomastjeffery on Thursday June 04, 2020 @02:09PM (#23419825)
I tried a few different layouts and decided norman is my second favorite.

Workman was slightly more difficult to learn, but that isn't really significant to me.

I've been typing with workman for a few years now, and am very happy with it.

Re:Workman Keyboard Layout (2010) by a-p-o on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @11:49PM (#23412192)
I consider my .vimrc-fu as only beginner, but can't you remap the keys so NIOH act as HJKL?
Re:Workman Keyboard Layout (2010) by Legogris on Thursday June 04, 2020 @12:32AM (#23412436)
Which becomes pretty annoying if you regularly work over remote SSH sessions to large number of hosts where you may not be the only person on a given user.

(You could have some local shorthand to copy over your vimrc and explicitly start vim with a different copy, at which point you'll only have problems with shared tmux/screen sessions)

Re:Workman Keyboard Layout (2010) by thomastjeffery on Thursday June 04, 2020 @02:25PM (#23419998)
You pretty quickly run into dependency hell.

You still want i mapped somewhere. Do you put that on qwerty-i/norman-r? Now where do you put r? qwerty-r/norman-f? Where do you put f? qwerty-f/norman-t?

It's a mess. It would be much better if commands weren't so tightly associated with keys in vim.