Re:Show HN: Stock Performance of US Senators
by derivativethrow on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @09:59PM
(#23411485)
No, material and nonpublic is necessary but insufficient for the trading to be illegal. It must also break a confidentiality agreement, fiduciary duty or specific law pertaining to the way the information is released to the person and their duties thereof.
This is to say that it's illegal for congresspeople to trade on material, nonpublic information because there is now a law explicitly governing it. If they (or anyone) develop the material, nonpublic information through original research, it's not illegal.
Don't trust Wikipedia summaries for these things.
Re:Show HN: Stock Performance of US Senators
by albntomat0 on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @10:00PM
(#23411495)
Do you have a good source to recommend with a more detailed overview?
Re:Show HN: Stock Performance of US Senators
by derivativethrow on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @10:02PM
(#23411509)
Read the SEC documentation on insider trading directly. Barring that, Matt Levine gives accessible (and entertaining) which is informative for a lay audience.
I'm not a lawyer, nor do I work in finance, but I think the key is what exactly constitutes "non-public information." I can trade on all the public information regarding Tesla's cars, like reviews, published production numbers, and Elon's tweets and my own analysis of all tat but not on the word of a someone who works there saying they've got some big unexpected news.
There's a bunch of interesting cases about whats on the edge, for example, commercial satellite imagery to count cars in parking lots[1].
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insider_trading#United_States_...
[1]: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/05/stock-v...