Things from leaked audio of Mark Zuckerberg and his employees

Re:Things from leaked audio of Mark Zuckerberg and his emplo... by syrrim on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @08:23PM (#23410849)

The GP specified elected official, not candidate.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Things from leaked audio of Mark Zuckerberg and his emplo... by JumpCrisscross on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @08:29PM (#23410894)

> GP specified elected official, not candidate

So incumbents get a material campaigning advantage?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Things from leaked audio of Mark Zuckerberg and his emplo... by syrrim on Thursday June 04, 2020 @11:07AM (#23417595)

Yes. Oh wait, were you talking about social media censorship?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Things from leaked audio of Mark Zuckerberg and his emplo... by kohtatsu on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @08:27PM (#23410884)

How will candidates become elected officials without access to the platforms their electorate are on?

I don't support Paul Nehlen, I just don't think it's that cut and dry.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Things from leaked audio of Mark Zuckerberg and his emplo... by syrrim on Thursday June 04, 2020 @11:15AM (#23417719)

I'm not saying the decision of which political candidates to censor should be cut and dry. Just that the decision of which elected officials to censor should be.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Things from leaked audio of Mark Zuckerberg and his emplo... by bigiain on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @09:57PM (#23411474)

So all that would have been OK if he were elected?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Things from leaked audio of Mark Zuckerberg and his emplo... by syrrim on Thursday June 04, 2020 @11:05AM (#23417547)

He wasn't elected because he had disagreeable opinions. If someone you disagree with is elected, then clearly their opinions are mainstream, if not agreeable.

[ Parent | on HN ]