News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Things from leaked audio of Mark Zuckerberg and his emplo... by TechBro8615 on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @06:25PM (#23409626)
> provably false statements

Herein lies the rub. It’s extremely rare that a politician is tweeting about something so black-and-white that the tweet can be provably true or false. There is almost always a gray area between fact and opinion. In fact, people tend to vote for politicians because they agree with their interpretation and prioritization of a set of facts. So I think you’ll find the vast majority of political tweets reside in this gray area, because otherwise they wouldn’t be political in the first place.

And if “provably false” is the standard for editorializing, then Twitter picked a terrible example to set as the precedent. The tweet they “fact checked” was Trump making a prediction about the future. Namely, he was suggesting that mail-in ballots could lead to increased voter fraud. Not only is this an opinion, but it’s a projection about something that has not happened yet. By definition, it cannot be provably false.

Re:Things from leaked audio of Mark Zuckerberg and his emplo... by jdhendrickson on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @06:37PM (#23409771)
Weird, I can think of at least one politician who constantly tweets, and most of it's easily proven false with the smallest modicum of research. It's almost like what you are saying has no basis in reality.
Re:Things from leaked audio of Mark Zuckerberg and his emplo... by joshuamorton on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @07:15PM (#23410166)
You're right. "No factual basis" might be a better standard. The claims Trump made had no factual basis. Twitter's addendum highlighted that fact. Nothing more.

I can't believe that people are criticizing an organization for exercising it's right to free speech. Like this wasn't even a case of removal of content. It was literally taking a sign and sticking another sign below it. It's something that the government would be allowed to do to a private citizen. It's that far away from censorship. And yet.

Re:Things from leaked audio of Mark Zuckerberg and his emplo... by bpyne on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @10:05PM (#23411527)
"No factual basis" is more accurate with respect to the particular example.