Re:Bland God: Notes on Mark Zuckerberg (2018)
by toyg on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @02:26PM
(#23406887)
Schwarzenegger would be a walk-in, regardless of which party he gets behind him.
There is a parallel reality where Democrats pushed hard to change the eligibility rules during Obama’s second term, selected Ahnold, and continued the Obama legacy of slow-going, moderate social progress. Sadly we are in a darker timeline.
Re:Bland God: Notes on Mark Zuckerberg (2018)
by threatofrain on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @03:33PM
(#23407658)
Arnold took a political beating from both sides when he failed to accumulate the capital to push any of his ideas through, and the experience appears to have left the governor with no enthusiasm to continue.
Re:Bland God: Notes on Mark Zuckerberg (2018)
by fatbird on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @01:30PM
(#23406092)
A bit weirdly, Bloomberg is exhibit B; Howard Schultz's attempt a few months earlier was Exhibit A, and about as successful. At some point, those same consultants had to convince Bloomberg he wouldn't be another Schultz.
Re:Bland God: Notes on Mark Zuckerberg (2018)
by mc32 on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @01:36PM
(#23406188)
Honestly both of them just winged it. They were unprepared for debates and when they had answers they were uninspiring, to say the least.
Re:Bland God: Notes on Mark Zuckerberg (2018)
by AQuantized on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @01:24PM
(#23406023)
Musk was born in South Africa, so isn't eligible for the presidency.
Edit: Must have only skimmed this thread before commenting because the parent mentions this, oops
If they were eligible, Schwarzeneggar (years ago) or Musk (now), would have a better shot —- still small —- because it would be a circus. And we have evidence that a circus can get you elected.