Re:Zoom says it won’t encrypt free calls so it can work more...
by JoeAltmaier on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @12:10PM
(#23405048)
I don't think history supports that. There were essentially zero childrens' rights until post-war. In some locations child abusers were originally prosecuted via animal-protection laws.
Re:Zoom says it won’t encrypt free calls so it can work more...
by dgellow on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @01:07PM
(#23405801)
The “protect the children” argument has little to do with actual children protection laws. It’s about using pathos of the crowd to manipulate opinion.
Regarding history, I don’t know about the US specifically, but Europeans countries have legal children protections since end of 19th, beginning of 20th centuries (depending on the country).
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_the_Rights_of_t... for a pre-WW2, international effort.
At the risk of being pedantic: it’s not new at all. That’s part of almost every political campaigns from the past century. Technically “reductio ad hitlerum” is the new “protect the children” argument.