Re:World's first liquid cooled 5G base station deployed in F...
by pulse7 on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @04:48AM
(#23401368)
Isn't the additional energy consumed also increasing the EM radiation levels?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:World's first liquid cooled 5G base station deployed in F...
by sk0g on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @05:24AM
(#23401547)
It's not harmful to life, so where's the problem in that?
Re:World's first liquid cooled 5G base station deployed in F...
by dmos62 on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @05:36AM
(#23401605)
Is there already a concensus that there's no biological response?
Re:World's first liquid cooled 5G base station deployed in F...
by pg-gadfly on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @06:31AM
(#23401899)
Behavior of microwaves is well-understood yes. Proving a negative would be rather difficult however, much like I find it hard to prove that no magical gnome exists at the bottom of my well, or that there is no renaissance-era teapot floating at the other side of our solar system perpendicular to our planet.
Re:World's first liquid cooled 5G base station deployed in F...
by im3w1l-alt on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @07:13AM
(#23402115)
What we all want to hear is that they blasted some poor animals with radiation their whole lives and nothing happened. And that they exposed people for a few years to no ill effects.
You know kinda like they do for new medicines.
Re:World's first liquid cooled 5G base station deployed in F...
by pg-gadfly on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @07:25AM
(#23402185)
Observing complex reactions with chemicals requires much longer study than simply beaming things with microwaves. Results are nearly immediate, and any long term effect would have to be shared with everything else that warms things.