News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Zoom says it won’t encrypt free calls so it can work more... by kjaftaedi on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @02:54AM (#23400688)
Personally I think the whole topic could just have been avoided by not saying anything at all.

Zoom needs a business model and saying "if you want encryption you need to pay for it", to me sounds like a reasonable approach to making money.

Once you start dragging other reasons into it, you need to start defending them.

Re:Zoom says it won’t encrypt free calls so it can work more... by Thorrez on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @03:15AM (#23400809)
I think it's perfectly reasonable to have multiple reasons for doing something. Making money and deterring malicious users are both valid reasons. Some forums have paid fees for the purpose of deterring unwanted users (MetaFilter, Something Awful, Bitcoin Wiki in the past), so it's certainly a strategy with a precedent.
Re:Zoom says it won’t encrypt free calls so it can work more... by kjaftaedi on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @06:07AM (#23401772)
Yes, you can have as many reasons as you want, but the more you list them off to the public, the more time you have to spend defending them individually.. was the point that I was making.
Re:Zoom says it won’t encrypt free calls so it can work more... by ashtonkem on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @10:43AM (#23403853)
There is a damn good reason why good PR people often refuse to comment. People remember stupid responses, but forget that “Zoom declined to comment to this article” very quickly.