Re:Civil rights leaders blast Facebook after meeting with Zu...
by amscanne on Tuesday June 02, 2020 @02:42PM
(#23394569)
The pro-life viewpoint considers pro-choice views to be advocating violence in the most direct way possible ("murdering babies"). That's the fundamental problem: there is a huge subjective grey area.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Civil rights leaders blast Facebook after meeting with Zu...
by stingrae on Tuesday June 02, 2020 @02:54PM
(#23394726)
ok... you can chose to not take a stance on grey areas and act on clear cut cases.
Re:Civil rights leaders blast Facebook after meeting with Zu...
by amscanne on Tuesday June 02, 2020 @02:58PM
(#23394785)
I am pretty sure that's the _intended_ Facebook stance, and the disagreement comes over what's a "grey area" and what's clear cut -- which is what makes it a grey area to begin with.
Re:Civil rights leaders blast Facebook after meeting with Zu...
by stingrae on Tuesday June 02, 2020 @03:05PM
(#23394863)
I don't see how the tweets twitter added an annotation to could be seen as grey area.
Re:Civil rights leaders blast Facebook after meeting with Zu...
by ThrowawayR2 on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @11:08AM
(#23404197)
> "ok... you can chose to not take a stance on grey areas and act on clear cut cases."
Eating meat is considered unethical by many and the fact that animals are often treated poorly by factory farming is not deniable. That's pretty clear cut. What ruling would you make?
Re:Civil rights leaders blast Facebook after meeting with Zu...
by anewdirection on Wednesday June 03, 2020 @06:55PM
(#23409953)
Yet my meat comes from sustainable near-wild farms that enhance the environ, not a factory farm. Should I have to listen to some loud vegan breathlessly proclaim all omnivores to be vile and lacking in ethics? Everything is a damned grey area.